Horaire
Rubriques
Liens
Session
string theory gibberish 2
--> draw me a time with Pi
i think Pi represent it well.
calculating the circumference or the diameter of a simple circle, you end up with an infinity of 'random' numbers, i find it fascinating.
and i think its like the string theory.
from a simple orbit and because of gravity, you can find an infinity of 'random' values so im sure that from the infinity of 'random' value that could represent the infinitely small you can end up with a circumference and a diameter kinda.
i dont know how to mathematicaly represent the world of the infinitely small with their quantum theory but if there is a link with the relativity theory and gravity, i guess its something like that.
expanding or shrinking, we have to consider the universe as something finite through but it dont really make sense to me.
what i mean is that if something is finite, there have to be something behind or beyond anyway and even if the whole system is like a loop or a sphere for instance, what is around it or again beyond it ?
so i guess that the string theory dont explain the whole universe as we conceive it but just the part our eyes can see kinda; or what our brain can understand maybe.
edit: well they talk about their other dimensons too but i need to read more about that i guess, i really dont know how they define their stuff lol i kinda just find it amusing in some ways.
its like time, we can define it as a line, but a segmented line that goes through dimensional reflexion of itself is a little hard to explain with words lol.
some timing are losing their randomness isnt it ?
[...]
maybe everything is just faster than light but of course we cant see it. ><
calculating the circumference or the diameter of a simple circle, you end up with an infinity of 'random' numbers, i find it fascinating.
and i think its like the string theory.
from a simple orbit and because of gravity, you can find an infinity of 'random' values so im sure that from the infinity of 'random' value that could represent the infinitely small you can end up with a circumference and a diameter kinda.
i dont know how to mathematicaly represent the world of the infinitely small with their quantum theory but if there is a link with the relativity theory and gravity, i guess its something like that.
expanding or shrinking, we have to consider the universe as something finite through but it dont really make sense to me.
what i mean is that if something is finite, there have to be something behind or beyond anyway and even if the whole system is like a loop or a sphere for instance, what is around it or again beyond it ?
so i guess that the string theory dont explain the whole universe as we conceive it but just the part our eyes can see kinda; or what our brain can understand maybe.
edit: well they talk about their other dimensons too but i need to read more about that i guess, i really dont know how they define their stuff lol i kinda just find it amusing in some ways.
its like time, we can define it as a line, but a segmented line that goes through dimensional reflexion of itself is a little hard to explain with words lol.
some timing are losing their randomness isnt it ?
[...]
Ecrit par noals, le Lundi 24 Février 2014, 21:43 dans la rubrique previous articles.
Repondre a cet article
Version XML - Cette page est peut-être encore valide XHTML1.1 et CSS sans tableaux.